The Euro Plus Pact
Conclusions of the European Council (24/25 March 2011) 11. The Euro Plus Pact as agreed by the euro area Heads of State or government and joined by Bulgaria, Denmark, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania (see annex I) will further strengthen the economic pillar of EMU and achieve a new quality of economic policy coordination, with the objective of improving competitiveness and thereby leading to a higher degree of convergence reinforcing our social market economy. The Pact remains open for other Member States to join. The Pact will fully respect the integrity of the Single Market. 12. The Member States that have signed up to the Pact are committed, on the basis of the indicators and principles it contains, to announce a set of concrete actions to be achieved within the next twelve months. A number of Member States have already announced first commitments. All participating Member States will present their commitments as soon as possible and in any event on time for their inclusion in their Stability or Convergence Programmes and National Reform Programmes to be submitted in April and for their assessment at the June European Council. Stronger economic policy coordination for competitiveness and convergence This Pact has been agreed by the euro area Heads of State or government and joined by Bulgaria, Denmark, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania to strengthen the economic pillar of the monetary union, achieve a new quality of economic policy coordination, improve competitiveness, thereby leading to a higher degree of convergence. This Pact focuses primarily on areas that fall under national competence and are key for increasing competitiveness and avoiding harmful imbalances. Competitiveness is essential to help the EU grow faster and more sustainably in the medium and long term, to produce higher levels of income for citizens, and to preserve our social models. Other Member States are invited to participate on a voluntary basis. This renewed effort for stronger economic policy coordination for competitiveness and convergence rests on four guiding rules: a. It will be in line with and strengthen the existing economic governance in the EU, while providing added value. It will be consistent with and build on existing instruments (Europe 2020, European Semester, Integrated Guidelines, Stability and Growth Pact and new macro-economic surveillance framework). It will involve a special effort going beyond what already exists and include concrete commitments and actions that are more ambitious than those already agreed, and accompanied with a timetable for implementation. These new commitments will thereafter be included in the National Reform and Stability Programmes and be subject to the regular surveillance framework, with a strong central role for the Commission in the monitoring of the implementation of the commitments, and the involvement of all the relevant formations of the Council and the Eurogroup. The European Parliament will play its full role in line with its competences. Social partners will be fully involved at the EU level through the Tripartite Social Summit. b. It will be focused, action oriented, and cover priority policy areas that are essential for fostering competitiveness and convergence. It will concentrate on actions where the competence lies with the Member States. In the chosen policy areas common objectives will be agreed upon at the Heads of State or Government level. Participating Member States will pursue these objectives with their own policy-mix, taking into account their specific challenges. c. Each year, concrete national commitments will be undertaken by each Head of State or Government. In doing so, Member States will take into account best practices and benchmark against the best performers, within Europe and vis-à-vis other strategic partners. The implementation of commitments and progress towards the common policy objectives will be monitored politically by the Heads of State or Government of the euro area and participating countries on a yearly basis, on the basis of a report by the Commission. In addition, Member States commit to consult their partners on each major economic reform having potential spill-over effects before its adoption. d. Participating Member States are fully committed to the completion of the Single Market which is key to enhancing the competitiveness in the EU and the euro area. This process will be fully in line with the treaty. The Pact will fully respect the integrity of the Single Market. Our goals Participating Member States undertake to take all necessary measures to pursue the following objectives: · Foster competitiveness · Foster employment · Contribute further to the sustainability of public finances · Reinforce financial stability Each participating Member State will present the specific measures it will take to reach these goals. If a Member State can show that action is not needed on one or the other areas, it will not include it. The choice of the specific policy actions necessary to achieve the common objectives remains the responsibility of each country, but particular attention will be paid to the set of possible measures mentioned below. Concrete policy commitments and monitoring Progress towards the common objectives above will be politically monitored by the Heads of State or Government on the basis of a series of indicators covering competitiveness, employment, fiscal sustainability and financial stability. Countries facing major challenges in any of these areas will be identified and will have to commit to addressing these challenges in a given timeframe. e. Foster competitiveness Progress will be assessed on the basis of wage and productivity developments and competitiveness adjustment needs. To assess whether wages are evolving in line with productivity, unit labour costs (ULC) will be monitored over a period of time, by comparing with developments in other euro area countries and in the main comparable trading partners. For each country, ULCs will be assessed for the economy as a whole and for each major sector (manufacturing; services; as well as tradable and non-tradable sectors). Large and sustained increases may lead to the erosion of competitiveness, especially if combined with a widening current account deficit and declining market shares for exports. Action to raise competitiveness is required in both all countries, but particular attention will be paid to those facing major challenges in this respect. To ensure that growth is balanced and widespread in the whole euro area, specific instruments and common initiatives will be envisaged to foster productivity in regions lagging behind. Each country will be responsible for the specific policy actions it chooses to foster competitiveness, but the following reforms will be given particular attention: (i) respecting national traditions of social dialogue and industrial relations, measures to ensure costs developments in line with productivity, such as: · review the wage setting arrangements, and, where necessary, the degree of centralisation in the bargaining process, and the indexation mechanisms, while maintaining the autonomy of the social partners in the collective bargaining process; · ensure that wages settlements in the public sector support the competitiveness efforts in the private sector (bearing in mind the important signalling effect of public sector wages). (ii) measures to increase productivity, such as: · further opening of sheltered sectors by measures taken at the national level to remove unjustified restrictions on professional services and the retail sector, to foster competition and efficiency, in full respect of the Community acquis; · specific efforts to improve education systems and promote R&D, innovation and infrastructure; · measures to improve the business environment, particularly for SMEs, notably by removing red tape and improving the regulatory framework (e.g. bankruptcy laws, commercial code). b. Foster employment A well functioning labour market is key for the competitiveness of the euro area. Progress will be assessed on the basis of the following indicators: long term and youth unemployment rates, and labour participation rates. Each country will be responsible for the specific policy actions it chooses to foster employment, but the following reforms will be given particular attention: · labour market reforms to promote “flexicurity”, reduce undeclared work and increase labour participation; · life long learning; · tax reforms, such as lowering taxes on labour to make work pay while preserving overall tax revenues, and taking measures to facilitate the participation of second earners in the work force. c. Enhance the sustainability of public finances In order to secure the full implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact, the highest attention will be paid to: · Sustainability of pensions, health care and social benefits This will be assessed notably on the basis of the sustainability gap indicators1. These indicators measure whether debt levels are sustainable based on current policies, notably pensions schemes, health care and benefit systems, and taking into account demographic factors. Reforms necessary to ensure the sustainability and adequacy of pensions and social benefits could include: · aligning the pension system to the national demographic situation, for example by aligning the effective retirement age with life expectancy or by increasing participation rates; · limiting early retirement schemes and using targeted incentives to employ older workers (notably in the age tranche above 55). · National fiscal rules Participating Member States commit to translating EU fiscal rules as set out in the Stability and Growth Pact into national legislation. Member States will retain the choice of the specific national legal vehicle to be used, but will make sure that it has a sufficiently strong binding and durable nature (e.g. constitution or framework law). The exact formulation of the rule will also be decided by each country (e.g. it could take the form of a "debt brake", rule related to the primary balance or an expenditure rule), but it should ensure fiscal discipline at both national and sub-national levels. The Commission will have the opportunity, in full respect of the prerogatives of national parliaments, to be consulted on the precise fiscal rule before its adoption so as to ensure it is compatible with, and supportive of, the EU rules. d. Reinforce financial stability A strong financial sector is key for the overall stability of the euro area. A comprehensive reform of the EU framework for financial sector supervision and regulation has been launched. In this context, Member States commit to putting in place national legislation for banking resolution, in full respect of the Community acquis. Strict bank stress tests, coordinated at EU level, will be undertaken on a regular basis. In addition, the President of the ESRB and the President of the Eurogroup will be invited to regularly inform Heads of State or Government on issues related to macro-financial stability and macroeconomic developments in the euro area requiring specific action. In particular, for each Member State, the level of private debt for banks, households and non-financial firms will be closely monitored. *** In addition to the issues mentioned above, attention will be paid to tax policy coordination. Direct taxation remains a national competence. Pragmatic coordination of tax policies is a necessary element of a stronger economic policy coordination in the euro area to support fiscal consolidation and economic growth. In this context, Member States commit to engage in structured discussions on tax policy issues, notably to ensure the exchange of best practices, avoidance of harmful practices and proposals to fight against fraud and tax evasion. Developing a common corporate tax base could be a revenue neutral way forward to ensure consistency among national tax systems while respecting national tax strategies, and to contribute to fiscal sustainability and the competitiveness of European businesses. The Commission has presented a legislative proposal on a common consolidated corporate tax base. Concrete yearly commitments In order to demonstrate a real commitment for change and ensure the necessary political impetus to reach our common objectives, each year participating Member States will agree at the highest level on a set of concrete actions to be achieved within 12 months. The selection of the specific policy measures to be implemented will remain the responsibility of each country, but the choice will be guided by considering in particular the issues mentioned above. These commitments will also be reflected in the National Reform Programmes and Stability Programmes submitted each year which will be assessed by the Commission, the Council, and the Eurogroup in the context of the European Semester. _____________________ ANNEX II Term Sheet on the ESM The European Council has decided to add to Article 136 of the Treaty the following paragraph: "The Member States whose currency is the euro may establish a stability mechanism to be activated if indispensable to safeguard the stability of the euro area as a whole. The granting of any required financial assistance under the mechanism will be made subject to strict conditionality". Further to this decision, the European Council has agreed on the need for euro-area Member States to establish a permanent stability mechanism: the European Stability Mechanism (ESM). The ESM will be activated by mutual agreement1, if indispensable to safeguarding the financial stability of the euro area as a whole. The ESM will assume the role of the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM) in providing external financial assistance to euro-area Member States after June 2013. Access to ESM financial assistance will be provided on the basis of strict policy conditionality under a macro-economic adjustment programme and a rigorous analysis of public-debt sustainability, which will be conducted by the Commission together with the IMF and in liaison with the ECB. The beneficiary Member State will be required to put in place an appropriate form of private-sector involvement, according to the specific circumstances and in a manner fully consistent with IMF practices. The ESM will have an effective lending capacity of € 500 billion2. The adequacy of the lending capacity will be reviewed on a regular basis and at least every five years. The ESM will seek to supplement its lending capacity through the participation of the IMF in financial assistance operations, while non-euro area Member States may also participate on an ad hoc basis. The remainder of this term sheet sets out the key structural features of the ESM: Institutional form The ESM will be established by a treaty among the euro-area Member States as an intergovernmental organisation under public international law and will be located in Luxembourg. The statute of the ESM will be set out in an annex to the treaty. Function and funding strategy The function of the ESM will be to mobilise funding and provide financial assistance, under strict conditionality, to the benefit of euro-area Member States, which are experiencing or are threatened by severe financing problems, in order to safeguard the financial stability of the euro area as a whole. The Member States of the euro area will give to the ESM the financial sanctions received under the Stability and Growth Pact and the Macroeconomic Imbalances procedures. Such sanctions will form part of the paid-in capital. The ESM will use an appropriate funding strategy so as to ensure access to broad funding sources and enable it to extend financial assistance packages to Member States under all market conditions. Any associated risk will be contained through adequate asset and liability management. Governance The ESM will have a Board of Governors consisting of the Ministers of Finance of the euro-area Member States (as voting members), with the European Commissioner for Economic and Monetary Affairs and the President of the ECB as observers. The Board of Governors will elect a Chairperson from among its voting members. The Board of Governors will be the highest decision-making body of the ESM and will take the following major decisions by mutual agreement: - the granting of financial assistance; - the terms and conditions of financial assistance; - the lending capacity of the ESM; - changes to the menu of instruments. All other decisions by the Board of Governors will be taken by qualified majority, unless stated otherwise. The ESM will have a Board of Directors, which will carry out specific tasks as delegated by the Board of Governors. Each euro-area Member state will appoint one Director and one alternate Director. In addition, the Commission and the ECB will each nominate an observer and an alternate to the Board of Directors. All decisions by the Board of Directors will be taken by qualified majority, unless otherwise stated. Voting weights within the Board of Governors and the Board of Directors will be proportional to the Member States’ respective subscriptions to the capital of the ESM. A qualified majority is defined as 80 percent of the votes. The Board of Governors will appoint a Managing Director responsible for the day-to-day management of the ESM. The Managing Director will chair the Board of Directors. Capital structure The ESM will aim to obtain and maintain the highest credit rating from the major credit rating agencies. The ESM will have a total subscribed capital of € 700 billion. Of this amount, € 80 billion will be in the form of paid-in capital provided by the euro-area Member States being phased in from July 2013 in five equal annual instalments. In addition, the ESM will also dispose of a combination of committed callable capital and of guarantees from euro area Member States to a total amount of € 620 billion. During the transitional phase from 2013 to 2017, Member States commit to accelerate, in the unlikely event that this is needed, the provision of appropriate instruments in order to maintain a minimum 15 percent ratio between paid-in capital and the outstanding amount of ESM issuances. The contribution key of each Member State in the total subscribed capital of the ESM will be based on the paid-in capital key of the ECB as annexed. By ratifying the Treaty establishing the ESM, Member States legally commit to provide their contribution to the total subscribed capital. The Board of Governors will decide by mutual agreement when adapting the amount of total subscribed capital or when calling capital, except in the specific cases described below. First, the Board of Directors can decide, by simple majority, to restore -by calling in capital- the level of paid-in capital in the event that the amount of paid-in capital is reduced by the absorption of losses1. Second, an on-demand guarantee procedure will be put in place that allows calling in capital automatically from the shareholders of the ESM if needed to avoid a payment shortfall to the creditors of the ESM. The liability of each shareholder will in all circumstances be limited to its share in the subscribed capital. Any contribution to subscribed capital by a Member State2 joining the ESM after July 2013 will be made according to the same terms applied for the original contributions. The practical implications for the overall amount of subscribed capital and the distribution of capital among the Member States will be decided by the Board of Governors by mutual agreement. As long as the ESM has not been activated and provided that the effective lending capacity is not less than 500 billion, the proceeds from the investment of the ESM paid-in capital will be returned to the Member States, after deductions for operational costs. Following the first activation of the ESM, the proceeds from the investment of ESM capital and financial assistance activity will be retained within the ESM. However, in the event that paid-in capital exceeds the level required to maintain the lending capacity of the ESM, the Board of Directors can decide, by simple majority to distribute a dividend to the euro-area Member States based on the contribution key. Instruments If indispensable to safeguard the stability of the euro area as a whole, in line with the amendment to Article 136 of the Treaty, the ESM will provide financial assistance subject to strict conditionality under a macro-economic adjustment programme, commensurate with the severity of the imbalances of the Member State. It will be provided through loans. However, it may intervene, as an exception, in debt primary markets on the basis of a macro-economic adjustment programme with strict conditionality and if agreed by the Board of Governors by mutual agreement. · ESM stability support (ESS) The ESM can grant short-term or medium term stability support to a euro-area Member State, which is experiencing severe financing problems. Access to an ESS will imply a macroeconomic adjustment programme with adequate policy conditionality commensurate with the severity of the underlying imbalances in the beneficiary Member State. The length of the programme and maturity of the loans will depend on the nature of the imbalances and the prospects of the beneficiary Member States regaining access to financial markets within the time that ESM resources are available. · Primary market support facility The ESM can purchase the bonds of a Member State, which is experiencing severe financing problems, on the primary market, with the objective of maximizing the cost efficiency of the support. Conditions and modalities under which bond purchasing would be conducted will be specified in the Decision on the terms and conditions of financial assistance. The Board of Governors may review the instruments at the ESM's disposal and may decide to make changes to the menu of instruments. IMF involvement The ESM will cooperate very closely with the IMF in providing financial assistance1. In all circumstances, active participation of the IMF will be sought, both on the technical and the financial level. The debt sustainability analysis will be jointly conducted by the Commission and the IMF, in liaison with the ECB. The policy conditions attached to a joint ESM/IMF assistance will be negotiated jointly by the Commission and the IMF, in liaison with the ECB. Activation of financial assistance, programme monitoring and follow-up Financial assistance from the ESM will in all cases be activated on a request from a Member State to the other Members States of the euro area. The Eurogroup will inform the Council that a request for activation of support has been made. On receipt of such a request, the Board of Governors will ask the Commission to assess, in liaison with the ECB, the existence of a risk to the financial stability of the euro area as a whole and to undertake a rigorous analysis of the sustainability of the public debt of the Member State concerned, together with the IMF and in liaison with the ECB. The subsequent steps in the activation of ESM financial assistance will be as follows: · If an ESS is requested, the Commission, together with the IMF and in liaison with the ECB, will assess the actual financing needs of the beneficiary Member State and the nature of the required private sector involvement, which should be consistent with IMF practices. · On the basis of this assessment, the Board of Governors will mandate the Commission to negotiate, together with the IMF and in liaison with the ECB, a macro-economic adjustment programme with the Member State concerned, detailed in a MoU. · The Commission will propose to the Council a decision endorsing the macro-economic adjustment programme. The Board of Governors will decide on the granting of financial assistance and the terms and conditions under which assistance is provided. When the programme has been adopted by the Council, the Commission will sign the MoU on behalf of the euro area Member States subject to prior mutual agreement by the Board of Governors. The Board of Directors will then approve the financial assistance agreement which would contain the technical aspects of the financial assistance to be provided. · The Commission, together with the IMF and in liaison with the ECB, will be responsible for monitoring compliance with the policy conditionality required by a macroeconomic adjustment programme. It will report to the Council and to the Board of Directors. On the basis of this report, the Board of Directors will decide by mutual agreement on the disbursement of the new tranches of the loan. · After discussion in the Board of Governors, the Council can decide, on a proposal by the Commission, to implement post-programme surveillance, which can be maintained for as long as a specified amount of the financial assistance has not been repaid. Consistency with the EU multilateral surveillance framework Approval by the EU Member States will be sought to allow the euro-area Member States to task the Commission, together with the IMF and in liaison with the ECB, the analysis of the debt sustainability of the Member State requesting financial support, the preparation of the adjustment programme accompanying the financial assistance, as well as with the monitoring of its implementation. While the Board of Governors has the autonomy to decide on the existence and modalities of financial assistance under an intergovernmental framework, the policy conditionality established under an enhanced surveillance or a macroeconomic adjustment programme should be consistent with the EU surveillance framework and must guarantee the respect of EU procedures. To this end, the Commission intends to propose a Regulation clarifying the necessary procedural steps under Article 136 of the Treaty in order to enshrine the policy conditionality in Council decisions and ensure consistency with the EU multilateral surveillance framework. The Council and the Commission will inform the European Parliament on a regular basis about the establishment and the operations of the ESM. Pricing The Board of Governors will decide on the pricing structure for financial assistance to a beneficiary Member State. The ESM will be able to lend at a fixed or variable rate. The pricing of the ESM will be in line with IMF pricing principles and, while remaining above the funding costs of ESM, will include an adequate mark up for risks. The following pricing structure will apply to ESM loans: 1) ESM funding cost 2) A charge of 200 bps applied on the entire loans 3) A surcharge of 100 bps for loan amounts outstanding after 3 years For fixed rate loans with maturities above 3 years, the margin will be a weighted average of the charge of 200 bps for the first 3 years and 200 bps plus 100 bps for the following years. The pricing structure will be defined in the pricing policy of the ESM, which will be reviewed periodically. Private sector involvement 1. Modalities for involving the private sector An adequate and proportionate form of private-sector involvement will be expected on a case by case basis where financial assistance is received by the beneficiary State. The nature and extent of this involvement will be determined on a case-by-case basis and will depend on the outcome of a debt sustainability analysis, in line with IMF practice1, and on potential implications for euro-area financial stability. (a) If, on the basis of a sustainability analysis, it is concluded that a macro-economic adjustment programme can realistically restore the public debt to a sustainable path, the beneficiary Member State will take initiatives aimed at encouraging the main private investors to maintain their exposures (e.g. a "Vienna Initiative" approach). The Commission, the IMF, the ECB and the EBA will be closely involved in monitoring the implementation of such initiatives. (b) If, on the basis of a sustainability analysis, it is concluded that a macro-economic programme cannot realistically restore the public debt to a sustainable path, the beneficiary Member State will be required to engage in active negotiations in good faith with its creditors to secure their direct involvement in restoring debt sustainability. The granting of the financial assistance will be contingent on the Member State having a credible plan and demonstrating sufficient commitment to ensure adequate and proportionate private sector involvement. Progress in the implementation of the plan will be monitored under the programme and will be taken into account in the decision on disbursements. In negotiating with creditors, the beneficiary Member State will adhere to the following principles: Proportionality: the Member State will seek solutions proportionate to its debt sustainability problem. Transparency: the Member State concerned will engage in an open dialogue with creditors and share relevant information with them on a timely basis. Fairness: the Member State will consult creditors on the design of any rescheduling or restructuring of public debt with a view to reaching negotiated solutions. Measures reducing the net present value of the debt will be considered only when other options are unlikely to deliver the expected results. Cross-border co-ordination: the risk of contagion and potential spill over effects on other Member States and third countries will be duly taken into account in the design of measures to involve the private sector. The measures taken will be accompanied with a proper communication by the Member State concerned aimed at preserving the financial stability of the Euro Area as a whole. 2. Collective Action Clauses Collective Action Clauses (CACs) will be included in all new euro area government securities, with maturity above one year, from July 2013. The objective of such CACs will be to facilitate agreement between the sovereign and its private-sector creditors in the context of private sector involvement. The inclusion of CACs in a bond will not imply a higher probability of default or of debt restructuring relating to that bond. Accordingly, the creditor status of sovereign debt will not be affected by the inclusion of CACs. The main features of the CACs will be consistent with those commonly used in the US and the UK markets since the G10 report on CACs. CACs will be introduced in a way which preserves a level playing field among euro area Member States. This implies the use of identical and standardized clauses for all euro area Member States, harmonized in the terms and conditions of securities issued by the Members States. Their basis will be consistent with the CACs that are common in New York and English law. CACs will include an aggregation clause, enabling a super majority of bondholders across multiple bond issues subject to such a clause and subject to the law of a single jurisdiction to include a majority action clause where the needed majority of creditors for the restructuration would not be attained within a single bond issue. Appropriate representation will be put in place. Most important issues – the reserve matters – (e.g. key payment terms, conversion or exchange of bonds) will be decided with a larger majority than non-reserve matters. Appropriate quorum requirements will apply. Changes agreed by the relevant majorities are binding on all bondholders. An appropriate disenfranchisement clause will apply to ensure a proper voting process. Appropriate clauses to prevent disruptive legal action will be considered. CACs will be introduced in a standardized manner, which ensures that their legal impact is identical in all euro-area jurisdictions and so preserves a level playing field among euro-area Member States. The euro area Member States will adopt the necessary measures to give effect to the CACs. Euro area Member States will be allowed to continue to “tap” outstanding debt without CACs under pre-determined conditions after June 2013 in order to preserve the necessary liquidity of old bonds and to give sufficient time to euro area Member States to create, in an orderly fashion, new bonds on all benchmark maturities. The detailed legal arrangements for including CACs in euro-area government securities will be decided on the basis of work to be undertaken by the EFC Sub-Committee on EU Sovereign Debt Markets, following appropriate consultation with market participants and other stakeholders, and be finalised by the end of 2011. 3. Preferred Creditor Status of the ESM Like the IMF, the ESM will provide financial assistance to a Member State when its regular access to market financing is impaired. Reflecting this, Heads of State or Government have stated that the ESM will enjoy preferred creditor status in a similar fashion to the IMF, while accepting preferred creditor status of IMF over ESM. This shall be effective as of 1 July 2013 without prejudice to the terms and conditions of any other agreement provided under the EFSF and the Greek facility. Transitional arrangements between EFSF and ESM As originally foreseen, the EFSF will remain in place after June 2013 so as to administer the outstanding bonds. It will remain operational until it has received full payment of the financing granted to the Member States and has repaid its liabilities under the financial instruments issued and any obligations to reimburse guarantors. Undisbursed and unfunded portions of existing loan facilities should be transferred to the ESM (e.g. payment and financing of instalments that would become due only after the entry into force of ESM). The consolidated EFSF and ESM lending shall not exceed € 500 bn. To ensure a smooth transition from the EFSF to the ESM, the CEO of the EFSF will be tasked with the practical preparation of the establishment of the ESM. He will regularly report on the progress made to the Eurogroup Working Group. Participation of the non euro area Member States Non euro area Member States can participate on an ad hoc basis alongside the ESM in financial assistance operations for euro area Member States. If non-euro area Member States participate in such operations, they will be represented in the relevant meetings of the ESM boards that will decide on the granting and the monitoring of the assistance. They will have access to all relevant information in a timely manner and be appropriately consulted. The euro area Member States will support equivalent creditor status of the ESM and that of other Member States lending bilaterally alongside the ESM. Dispute settlement If a dispute arises between a euro area Member State and the ESM in connection with the interpretation and application of the treaty establishing the ESM, the Board of Governors will decide on this dispute. If the Member State contests this decision, such dispute shall be submitted to the European Court of Justice in accordance with Art. 273 TFEU. With regard to the relationship between the ESM and third parties, the applicable governing law and jurisdiction will be dealt with by the legal and contractual documentation which will then be put in place between the ESM and those third parties. Annex: ESM contribution key based on the ECB key
| Country | ISO | ESM key | | Austria | AT | 2.783 | | Belgium | BE | 3.477 | | Cyprus | CY | 0.196 | | Estonia | EE | 0.186 | | Finland | FI | 1.797 | | France | FR | 20.386 | | Germany | DE | 27.146 | | Greece | EL | 2.817 | | Ireland | IE | 1.592 | | Italy | IT | 17.914 | | Luxembourg | LU | 0.250 | | Malta | MT | 0.073 | | Netherlands | NL | 5.717 | | Portugal | PT | 2.509 | | Slovakia | SK | 0.824 | | Slovenia | SI | 0.428 | | Spain | ES | 11.904 | | Total | EA17 | 100.0 |
Notes: The ESM key is based on the ECB capital contribution key. Member States with a GDP per capita of less than 75% of the EU average will benefit from a temporary correction for a period of 12 years after their entry in the euro area. This temporary correction will be three quarters of the difference between GNI and ECB capital shares (effectively comprising of 75% of GNI share and 25% of ECB capital share) as follows: ESM share = ECB key share - 0,75*(ECB key share - GNI share) The downwards compensation on those countries is redistributed among all the other countries according to their ECB key share. GNI and GDP per capita in 2010. Sources: ECB, Ameco and DG ECFIN calculations. 1 : In line with the Council's conclusions of 15 February and 7 March 2011 and further to the Commission's Annual Growth Survey. See also the Presidency's synthesis report of 16 March 2011. 1 : The sustainability gap are indicators agreed by the Commission and Member States to assess fiscal sustainability. 1 : 2 : 1 : 2 : 1 : Discuss this theme
Current discussions
|
()
- 0
|
|
|
()
- 0
|
|
|
()
- 0
|
|
|
()
- 0
|
|
|